Happiness can be Lonely

  • Uncategorized


Happinesscan be Lonely

Happinesscan be Lonely

Accordingto John Stuart Mill, only happiness has intrinsic value. Happiness isintrinsically good this means it is noble in itself and not just ameans to some other good. The argument raises problems in whichhappiness is fundamentally good for people. This is true as far as itis an internal tool that attracts them towards other things that playa key role in their functioning. Secondly, happiness is not an end initself it is connected to individuals’ sense of what intrinsicvalue means. Thirdly, the pursuit of happiness sometimes generates acontradictory effect of reduced happiness. The intrinsic value ofhappiness is vital and depends on the circumstance in which itaccomplishes its appropriate instrumental role.

Happinessis only intrinsically good if it attracts people to things that playa major role in their performance. It evolves from its efficacy inassisting them operate in the ways required to thrive in the veryfunctions in which their being consist. Human beings functionalitiesare what they are, and hence, they are the only fully intrinsicvalues, which do not draw their value from considering any more basicgoods. The intrinsic goodness of people is just this efficacy of itscharacteristic functioning. Individuals do not exist without suchoperation since it is inherent of indispensable and ultimate value tothe person as regards the ways it exists. Happiness, in itself, doesnot constitute any of the human beings fundamental roles. Instead, itis a factor of the multiple functions. It is a component, a piece, ofvarious intrinsic functions and their total functioning power. Itplays only an instrumental role in intrinsic functioning.

Theobjective value of happiness is evident in its instrumental role inguiding people towards functioning both maximally and minimally well.Happiness is not an end-in-itself for human beings nonetheless, itis an end-in-itself for itself. People love happiness and haveevolved to think of it in that manner as this helps it accomplish itsvital role in helping them thrive in their characteristic functions.To comprehend the objective, factual, truthful value of happiness,and all other things referred to as good, there is a need to analyzethem regarding fact associations of efficacy.

Millargued that nothing is desirable to human beings except happiness.People desire things such as glory, money, virtue and wisdom as partof happiness. According to Ford and Mauss (2013), people are lesslikely to experience positive outcomes such as feelings of happinessfrom pursuing positive emotions. The research thus suggested adifferent impact on Mills` argument. The pursuit of happinesssometimes leads to a paradoxical effect of reduced happiness. In somecontexts, the feeling of happiness is not advantageous. Happiness isnot appropriate for all settings since people face variousenvironmental or situational challenges that are served byexperiencing other emotions. For instance, anger duringconfrontational situations is associated with general higherwell-being. Happiness in such circumstances is associated withnegative adaptive and psychological welfare.

Overall,the intrinsic value of happiness is instrumental and depends on thecircumstance or situation in which it accomplishes its appropriateinstrumental role. It is only intrinsically good if it plays a keyrole in the manner individuals perform. It is a factor of people’sfunctions. Happiness is an end-in-itself for itself and guides one toperform maximally and minimally. It depends on the situation orcontext to serve as a good for people. It has instrumental valuesince it depends on people’s circumstances to accomplish itsappropriate instrumental role.


Ford,B., &amp Mauss, I. (2013). Theparadoxical effects of pursuing positive emotion: When and

whywanting to feel happy backfires.Retrieved fromhttps://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~eerlab/pdf/papers/Ford_Mauss_Pursuit_of_Positive_Emotion.pdf