How The US Is Unfair to Its Poor People in The 21st Century

  • Uncategorized

Running head: HOW THE US IS UNFAIR TO ITS POOR PEOPLE IN 21ST CENTURY 1

How The US Is Unfair to Its Poor People in The 21stCentury

How The US Is Unfair to Its Poor People in The 21stCentury

The poor people in America that mainly consist of the minorities haveoften complained about the lack of government support in improvingtheir conditions. In reality, the government has failed to offer theopportunities that can facilitate their likelihood of succeeding.This essay will reveal how the government has failed to stop theracial discrimination in the job market, banned certain businesses,and placed strict requirements for the minorities seeking loanfacilities, and the issues have clearly intensified the situation ofthe poor people.

The government has failed to set strict policies that will reduce theracial employment gap. In this case, the poor people have been unableto get the jobs that can help them in getting a constant source ofincome. Alan et al. (n.d.) reveal that the “unemployment rate foradult white high-school dropouts (11.4 percent) was less than therate for blacks with some college education or an associate’sdegree (11.6 percent)” (417). The scenario clearly proves that thepoor people are less likely to get money that can improve theirconditions because of the discrimination.

Most minorities have been unable to access any loan facilities thatcan assist them in financing their business ventures. In particular,Alan et al. (n.d.) assert that “more stringent collateral andcredit requirements” have led to the black businesses failing toget enough loans that can support their daily needs (420). Moreimportant, the Black people have been unable to secure employmentopportunities, and starting business ventures have turned out to be ahuge problem.

The government has also focused on banning ice creams and cigaretteswith the aim of protecting the population, yet, they are interferingwith business opportunities. However, abolishing ice cream inBrooklyn and the cigarettes in New York showed how the government wasnot ready to support the poor people in saving themselves from severepoverty (Mangu-Ward, n.d.). Most minorities are simply trying tocreate a proper way of getting enough income to cater to their needsand ending such initiatives shows the lack of government support.

The US government should provide a supportive environment that willoffer the poor people a chance to get the loan facilities andfriendly policies. Most of the Black people and other minoritiescannot access the loans because of the strict requirements. Hence,the government should make the required changes to facilitate theirbusiness activities and ensure that they get enough profits toimprove their situation. More important, they can also offer jobopportunities to the other unemployed youths that have a difficulttime supporting themselves.

Alan et al. insist that the federal job guarantee will provide anopportunity for every American to be employed. More important, thejobs often create the financial security that can sustain them in thelong-run (Alan et al., n.d.). The platform will reduce thediscrimination that the poor Black people and other minorities havebeen experiencing in the job market. Perhaps, they will get a chanceto earn enough money and move to the proper neighborhoods.

In conclusion, the government has ignored the interests of the poorpeople, and there is the need to create proper measures to interveneand reduce the poverty that they are experiencing. For instance, thestrict requirements in most banks show how the government shouldestablish a supportive environment that will facilitate theirbusiness activities. Enough job opportunities will also assist theminorities in getting income to support their expenses as well.

References

Alan Aja, Daniel Bustillo,William Darity, Jr., and Darrick Hamilton. (n.d.). Froma Tangle of Pathology to a RaceFair America.

Mangu-Ward,Katherine (n.d.). The war on negative liberty